Seeking The Truth - McCarthy: Obama Rigged FBI Investigation So Hillary Would Avoid Jail

Former assistant U.S. attorney Andrew McCarthy claims that Barack Obama rigged the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton to ensure she would not face jail over her criminal use of a private email server.

In an Op-ed for National Review, McCarthy notes that Obama exchanged around 20 emails with Hillary. One of those emails is from Hillary while she was visiting Russia. The FBI concluded it was very likely “hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account” during this secretive exchange with the former President.

Thepoliticalinsider.com reports: Obama and his administration didn’t want anyone to know of his involvement in the email scandal, which is why he once claimed he first learned of the email scandal by watching the news.

Now, we’re learning extra details that show those exchanges contained classified information. This means that if Clinton illegally mishandled this information, it was also mishandled on the other end by Obama. Without an indictment, Obama assumed those exchanges would never surface.

These points made by McCarthy are reinforced by newly released text messages from anti-Trump FBI employees Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. Now we know the rest of the story. Obama was cleaning up the mess:

Obama had his email communications with Clinton sealed. He did this by invoking a dubious presidential-records privilege. The White House insisted that the matter had nothing to do with the contents of the emails, of course; rather, it was intended to vindicate the principle of confidentiality in presidential communications with close advisers. With the media content to play along, this had a twofold benefit: Obama was able (1) to sidestep disclosure without acknowledging that the emails contained classified information, and (2) to avoid using the term “executive privilege” — with all its dark Watergate connotations — even though that was precisely what he was invoking.

Note that claims of executive privilege must yield to demands for disclosure of relevant evidence in criminal prosecutions. But of course, that’s not a problem if there will be no prosecution.

Then, on a Fox News interview, Obama made it clear again that he didn’t want to have Hillary Clinton indicted under any circumstance:

His rationale was a legally frivolous straw man: Clinton had not intended to harm national security.

No matter: Obama’s analysis was the stated view of the chief executive. If, as was sure to happen, his subordinates in the executive law-enforcement agencies conformed their decisions to his stated view, there would be no prosecution.

Join me on my new Social Network called Buddylist to discuss more.  https://www.buddylist.co

Join our Discord Server: https://discord.gg/YGDeHx6

Our Official Online Store : https://www.seekingthetruth.info/store/

Every sale will help this channel keep going.

My YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/seekingthetru...

Join our YouTube Collab Network : https://tv.buddylist.co

Add me up on Facebook if you like: https://www.facebook.com/joshwho1

Find me on Steemit Here: https://steemit.com/@truthseeker101

Support the channel: https://www.patreon.com/truthseeker

My Bitcoin Wallet Address: 17S5o2Thyqcw9TqtFyQAQdAtjSwJJ95rcE

PayPal Address: ts@seekingthetruth.info

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted.
"Fair Use" guidelines: www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
Category
News & Politics
License
Standard YouTube License